Man Convicted of Peabody Murder Denied Parole

Charles Doucette killed Raymond Bufalino on the Peabody-Salem line in 1987. He also pleaded guilty to a home invasion in Peabody while he was out on a previous parole.

A Beverly man who pled guilty to second-degree murder for the 1987 shooting death of Raymond Bufalino was denied parole in a decision released by Massachusetts Parole Board late last week.  

Charles Doucette, 53, of Beverly "clearly poses a threat to public safety,” District Attorney Jonathan Blodgett said.  “On multiple occasions, while out on bail or while on parole, Mr. Doucette has engaged in threats and serious acts of violence which call into question his ability to function in society.” 

On Feb. 21, 1987, Charles Doucette shot Raymond Bufalino twice in the head over a dispute about money, while they sat in the victim’s car on Harmony Grove Road on the Peabody-Salem line. 

While out on bail, Doucette threatened to kill a Commonwealth witness in the pending murder case.  A jury convicted Doucette of first-degree murder but the Superior Court trial judge vacated the verdict and released Doucette. 

The Supreme Judicial Court later reinstated the first degree murder verdict and Doucette was granted a motion for a new trial.  After he posted bail and was released in 1991, he committed two violent home invasions in Peabody and Lynnfield.

In December of 1991, Doucette pleaded guilty to second degree murder of Raymond Bufalino, witness intimidation, three counts of home invasion,  three counts of armed robbery, and two counts of stealing by confining or putting a person in fear.  He was sentenced to seven concurrent life sentences with the possibility of parole.

In 2006, Doucette was granted parole after serving 15 years over the objection of the Essex District Attorney’s Office. 

On Feb. 14, 2011, Beverly Police arrested Doucette and charged him with assault and battery with a dangerous weapon, witness intimidation and threats. 

The Essex District Attorney’s Office filed a dangerousness petition requesting that Doucette be held without bail while the case was pending, which was granted by a district court judge.  As a result, the Parole Board revoked Doucette’s parole.  On March 20, 2012, the Parole Board held a hearing to determine whether Doucette should be released.

The Board also imposed the maximum review period of five years.  

In opposing his parole, Essex Assistant District Attorney and Appeals Division Chief Elin Graydon argued that Doucette has never taken responsibility for the “execution-style” murder of Bufalino, has minimized his drug and alcohol use and has failed to engage in any meaningful programming while incarcerated to address these issues.  “Until and unless he confronts and addresses the causative factors of the murder, he is not an appropriate candidate for release on parole.”

Drawn from a press release by the District Attorney's Office. 

Carl E. February 21, 2013 at 01:12 AM
"He also pleaded guilty to a home invasion in Peabody while he was out on a previous parole." Whatever happened to the word PLED....as in "He also pled guilty to a home invasion in Peabody while he was out on a previous parole?" I have noticed this trend in all outlets of media...using the word "pleaded" instead of "pled." To me, the word "pleaded" is more appropriate as a synonym for the word "begged." As in, "he pleaded for his life." I refuse to conform! He PLED guilty! Rant complete.
Chris Helms February 21, 2013 at 10:22 AM
Thanks, Carl. I always enjoy a good English usage debate. The journalism Bible, the AP Style Manual, has it thus: "Plead, pleaded, pleading: Do not use the colloquial past tense form, pled."
DEBBIE February 21, 2013 at 06:00 PM
Chuckie Doucette is a very bad person. He's a monster. He needs to stay locked up for life. The two home invasions, both in Peabody and Lynnfield were cold-blooded, but that is Chuckie's way, pure evil. He NEVER should of been out on bail after he murdered another man over a few bucks. If the system was on top of these slugs, he would of been locked up and the victims never would of gone through his cruel ways. Pathetically, this thug gets seven life terms but he is asking for parole. He never should of been eligible for parole. HELLO! Something is way out of whack in our court system. Shame on us. The laws need to be changed immediately, if not sooner. No more of this concurrent crap.
Arthur February 21, 2013 at 10:15 PM
This man should never have been released to begin with


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »