- Local every day in
After two days of monitoring OccupyBoston in the media, and on Twitter, I decided it was time for a trip to Dewey Square. I went to the General Assembly on Monday. It was damp and threatening more rain, but given the weekend storms they’d been camping in, it seemed certain the weather would have little effect on attendance.
As I arrived, the facilitator was finishing up a quick review of communication protocol, which consisted of a series of hand signal that allowed the facilitator to “take the temperature” of the crowd. I moved toward the front and found a place to sit as she was finishing up the review. “Opinions and feelings,” she said, and the crowd chanted in response, “OPINIONS AND FEELINGS.” She continued, “are not,” and then the crowd “ARE NOT.” “Points of information.” A rumbling chuckle accompanied, “POINTS OF INFORMATION.”
It seemed odd, the call and response. But it turns out, that wasn’t what they were doing. It was the “peoples’ mic” whereby the people helped to amplify an individual whose comments and questions would not otherwise be heard by the crowd. I’d missed that part of the review.
The first item on the agenda was announcements, and representatives from each committee came forward with their updates. First up was Media. It had been an exciting day, as the spark had taken hold and coverage of OccupyBoston was growing exponentially. After a brief celebratory moment, the speaker added, “But remember, this is not an exercise in entertainment for the main stream media!”
A tall thin man, reminiscent of the tin man from the Wizard of Oz, took the stage next. He was modest in demeanor but clear in his task. He represented “Legal.” He encouraged anyone planning on doing something that might get them arrested to stop by the tent and fill in an intake form. This would let others know what to do should they end up in jail.
The Medical staff members, identifiable by their red crosses, were next. There was a brief review of general hygiene and then, “We are not telling you to wear shoes at all times, but PLEASE wear shoes at all times.” Another rumbled chuckle from the crowd.
The representative from Logistics was a young woman with a small frame and a focused presence. “There is no more room in Dewey Square,” she said. She asked that people wait for a cohesive plan, rather than planting themselves willy nilly around the city as occupiers in other cities has done.
It started to rain a little bit and there was shuffling and rattling as people pulled out donated ponchos or opened up their umbrellas. Some left, but not many. It was time to move onto the next agenda item, but something had started to shift in the crowd.
The process, remarkably smooth and efficient given the number of people present, became destabilized by a few people who were unable to understand that their actions, and it is in no way inappropriate to say their selfish actions, were causing a great deal of damage. The facilitator, being the one with the microphone, came under fire. The process began to wobble as a few more gained control. Others became giddy with the ill-gotten power. The next 20-40 minutes were spent trying to corral those blindly wandering around bumping into everything. And though there was a gradual cohesion re-established, the topic for discussion was abandoned.
This is the point at which many people might throw up their hands as say, “It’s never going to work.” But they would be wrong.
The occupiers are attempting to create a model of democracy that has never had a chance to flourish. It is a messy process, but it creates solutions that are multi-dimensional, because they are the result of many blended voices. It is the process of non-linear thinking. Educators currently refer to it as divergent thinking. The occupiers are applying that this way of thinking to governance. It hasn’t been done before.
I spoke with someone involved with facilitation after the meeting. “Did they eat you alive, too?” I asked. “Oh, yeah,” she said. “So what are you going to do?” I asked. She went on to explain her plan, whereby the agenda is posted and Tweeted about in advance of assembly so everyone has time to review it. The first 10 minutes of the next meeting would be spent on amendments posited by the crown. After that, the topic is closed. No challenges, no more discussion.
It’s a good start.
On the train ride home I reviewed the contents of my head, and I was struck by the irony of what had happened. The topic for discussion had been to find ways of protecting the disenfranchised voices from the whims of the vocal few.
It is not a small task that has been taken on. It is by no means easy, nor is it intended to be. Challenging the power structure is particularly difficult when your allies have been trained to follow the power structure. Success depends not on overturning the few already in power. Success depends on empowering the many despite the resistence of the few.
About this blog: Fourth-generation JPer Lisa Hiserodt blogs observations of Occupy Boston, currently occupying Dewey Square in the Financial District to protest financial disparity and lack of a functioning democracy, and part of a movement that is blossoming into hundreds of nationwide protests modeled on Occupy Wall Street.
Sarah Betancourt
10:51 am on Thursday, October 6, 2011
This piece is wonderful. I've sent it to multiple organizations considering getting behind the movement so that they can be respectful of the democratic process through which Occupiers make decisions and voice opinions.
Karla Vallance
11:09 am on Thursday, October 6, 2011
Agreed, Sarah; a fascinating inside peek.
Seamus O'Sullivan
1:52 pm on Thursday, October 6, 2011
The group should really be called Something to Occupy My Time Because I Have Nothing Better To Do. What a waste of media coverage. 10 of these people will give you 20 different answers as to what they are trying to achieve. Absolutely no message or cohesion among them, and they are achieving nothing aside from making themselves look like idiots. I'm sure Bank of America and the rest of Wall Street are shaking in their proverbial boots.
Michelle Moyer
7:09 pm on Thursday, October 6, 2011
No message? Here's one:
http://nycga.cc/2011/09/30/declaration-of-the-occupation-of-new-york-city/
Michelle Moyer
7:09 pm on Thursday, October 6, 2011
Just curious - do you think the same thing about the Tea Party?
Joseph
2:13 pm on Thursday, October 6, 2011
No permits for Tent City. Tent City is illegal. Mayor Mumbles is turning a blind eye, and wasting our tax dollars paying the cops on these "details" to keep watch. Tent City is ruining the fresh sod that was just planted, which will have to be replaced. Who's paying for all of this? Is this peaceful protest something we're able to afford? Unions spending money on busing in their members. Shouldn't they be conserving their funds? Talk about a waste of money. If these protesters spent this much effort getting a job, they would have one! I respect the right to protest, and appreciate the peaceful way they are doing so, but seriously, can't we spend our tax dollars on something a little bit more resourceful?
James
3:16 pm on Thursday, October 6, 2011
Concern troll is concerned!
Joseph
5:01 pm on Thursday, October 6, 2011
My office is a few blocks from Tent City. Walked through at lunch. Sign states, "We're not leaving until you give us jobs." Let me ask, "What makes you qualified for a job?" I'd have more respect for these people if they came dressed for an interview with a resume in hand. At least that shows they're actually interested in trying for a job instead of feeling entitled to one.
Michelle Moyer
7:05 pm on Thursday, October 6, 2011
That was only one sign, not a mission statement for the whole movement. But if the person holding it is anything like the unemployed people I know, he or she has been dressed for interviews and writing resumes for months with no success. Your comment implies that you think the high unemployment rate is due to individual problems, rather than the recession - is that what you think?
James
9:27 pm on Thursday, October 6, 2011
If you walked right by the person with the sign, why didn't you ask them your question? Is it because you feel more confident being sanctimonious on the Internet?
James LaFond-Lewis
6:03 am on Friday, October 7, 2011
Joseph,
How old are you? What makes you think that these people with all this energy to protest haven't been looking for jobs? Do you really think that there are that many people who fit neatly into your idea of who they are? Protesters are not complacent people. You should try hiring one. Post your job and walk among them. Your office is right there.
Joseph
9:03 am on Friday, October 7, 2011
1 - MBTA supplying power/electricity to Tent City. MBTA can barely pay their own bills, now wasting money on this. But I guess this is an acceptable use of money? I guess wasting money like this is acceptable, but businesses trying to make a profit is unacceptable? Why don’t you have comments about the waste of money going on supporting Tent City?
2 - Sign was posted on a lamp post, not being held by an individual James. Have you walked through? Have you read the other signs there? Judging by the appearance of the majority, I would have to say they aren’t trying too hard. What confuses me Michelle is while they may not be getting the job they are looking for, there are jobs available. Work for living and stop expecting handouts (unemployment checks). I understand the job market is difficult, I have several friends that are either unemployed or are working in the industry/field that they aren’t trained for. Point is, they are working and don’t feel entitled.
3- Gen-X. Why does that matter? James LaFond, I’m going to say they can’t get a job in a field they want, therefore refuse to work in something less desirable. Protest all you want...but if they really wanted a job, why not protest looking like you actually want a job? And furthermore, how are they able to look for a job if they are camping in a tent? With the amount of attention they are receiving, they should have enough common sense to hand out resumes like fliers.
Pat Roberts
3:34 pm on Friday, October 7, 2011
I guess history often repeats itself. Is this the second time, as farce? We did all this in the 60s (no leaders, let all voices be heard, etc.). I guess it sounds really good--no icky leaders to boss us around. It opens these groups up to manipulation and control by whomever is the most skilled at hiding their agenda while making things go their way. The absence of political analysis and understanding is another invitation for manipulation. It's embarrassing to see our past played out again in front of us. Maybe these people will grow up more quickly than we did.
Dan
9:58 am on Saturday, October 8, 2011
Joseph -
I think you've missed the point this is a sit-in not a job fair!
I also think you have the idea all these people are white collar trades people looking for work (I'm sure some are) many aren't. Be thankful you have a job.
There was a time when one could find an occupation to carry them through life and retire. Today that is no longer the case! Many people have had to change their life directions more than once and as time moves forward I'm sure it will happen more often not less and little retirement possibilities. We live in a less stable world (job wise). Many occupations take years to learn which forces more elderly people to the side lines instead of being productive in our society. On the most part many of these people don't want a hand out that want a hand up with some level of job training and less corporate greed so the they can compete for the jobs that are available.
The other factor here is the tipping point of the disenfranchise if we don't address the needs of the common man/woman. If we don't deal with it fairly, it will force sweeping changes as did the Arab Spring did in northern Africa.
Do we need to suffer the riots and bloodshed that will be thrust upon us if we collectively hold a ridged line you appear to be championing or can we make the changes peacefully through the democratic process? I hope were smarter than that to let this fester without addressing the root causes of the discontent.
Amy BB
11:44 am on Monday, October 10, 2011
Has anyone thought that it is possible that some (if not all) protesters do have jobs, perhaps part-time jobs that they work when not in Dewey Square?
So many assumptions, so little time!
Dan
2:53 pm on Tuesday, October 11, 2011
Here's what Suze Orman thinks of this group:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/suze-orman/occupy-wall-street-approv_b_1005128.html
Joseph
10:06 am on Wednesday, October 12, 2011
Finally...an article that addresses my biggest problem with these squatters.
http://bostonherald.com/news/regional/view/2011_1012occupiers_dipping_into_hubs_pockets/
James
11:19 am on Wednesday, October 12, 2011
Concern troll found someone to share his concern in the Herald. Surprise, surprise.
Dan
2:44 pm on Wednesday, October 12, 2011
Joseph stay on point, don't cloud the issues at hand.
Do you think every peace rally of the late '60s and '07s didn't cost anything or the race equality protests of the '50s and 60's were free?
Even today political groups rally's are not fully paid for by the group sponsoring them. Do you think the Tea Party paid for the police details at the beginning or even pays the entire cost now that they are flush with money.
Kasey Hariman
11:50 am on Wednesday, October 12, 2011
It's fine to disagree, but rather than referring to Patch site visitors as unseemly bridge-dwellers, can you point out which aspects of the Patch article you agree or disagree with, and why? Let's keep discussion going!
Marc near the Park
2:31 pm on Wednesday, October 12, 2011
There is definitely some legitimacy to Joseph's view point James, whether or not you agree. The multi-pronged attack on the power structure as we know it may be noble in orgin, but it is a little misguided and hypocritical. Social media spreads the word on mobile devices brought to you ______.inc. I think personal accountability is the one sure fire way to make a better life for yourself in this country. Self-development, seek opportunities, etc. The whole "we are the %99" angle, I'd like to hear what the rest of the world thinks of that. The amount that people can obtain and consume here in the good ol' USA for doing nothing is another part of what is wrong with "the system."
Michelle Moyer
3:20 pm on Wednesday, October 12, 2011
The message is being misinterpreted, I think. Terminology and communication issues are problematic on all sides.
The message "against" corporations is primarily against the financial corporations, which engaged in practices that have nearly brought the economy down (and still might) - not so much against the corporations that actually make stuff, except insofar as those corporations participate in offshoring and other endeavors that hinder American workers, or whose CEOs make 350 times more than the average worker.
I expect that most protestors would agree with you about personal accountability and self-development, but would argue that the field is no longer level and therefore personal endeavor is not sufficient for most of us to make it. From Business Insider: Here's what the Wall Street protesters are so angry about: http://read.bi/rlRDFB
Marc near the Park
7:12 pm on Wednesday, October 12, 2011
Thanks Michelle, I'll read that. I will admit I am somewhat inclined to be drawn to the comments and ideas that are far out of left field on the "Occupy" side of things, so I'm curious to hear another viewpoint.
Dan
3:14 pm on Wednesday, October 12, 2011
Kasey,
Can you publish some polls of the people who are attending these protests? So people can put some perspective on who they are and why they feel oppressed.
From the reports I'm hearing (with no hard data to support it) of the people here in Boston the bias is more to the young still in collage or just graduated that can't find jobs to help defer the costs of going to school or to start paying back their loans.
The older folks present are largely unemployed or under-unemployed which are protesting on the Jobs front. They are the ones pointing out the decaying bridges and road infrastructure that need fixing (could create jobs now). The rest are protesting the bank and corporate greed area.
The rest of the groups outside of Boston appear to have more a bias toward the bank and corporate greed areas.
Dan
3:52 pm on Wednesday, October 12, 2011
While many may argue on Frank Capra's politics.
The idyllic lens in his movie "It's A Wonderful Life" where the community helped out the beleaguered George Bailey bailout the savings and loan cooperative his feeble uncle put at risk. Shows how a community can get together for the greater good at the worse of times. Not just helping poor George, but themselves as well.
To think this can only happen in a movie is also very myopic! Did we forget the events over the years of strife where we came together to help each other, stranger helping stranger - One on One? 9/11 or Haiti and Japan (both still in great need) that far from our minds we have forgotten?
Today our view is often at a distance, as such we appear not to get involved as strongly as if we feel it first hand. Yes, people have taken advantage of the kindness shown stealing goods and money. Has that clouded the view point on helping the ones in desperate need?
I suspect corporate america has become myopic forgetting there place. Yes, they do need to think of their stock holders, but they also need to think of communities they serve.
Being the only survivor after a nuclear holocaust would not be very fun.
Joseph
4:31 pm on Wednesday, October 12, 2011
James – Are you able to contribute anything other than calling me a troll? I mean, come on bro, a troll? Until you’re capable of providing any thought or opinion on the topics being discussed, why don’t you do home and get your shine box. The Herald is one publication that I read/scan daily…followed by The Globe, NY Times, Wall Street Journal, CNN, Drudge and a few others. I also watch CNBC, BloombergTV, CNN, FOXFinancial, BBC and some others. It’s my job to read and keep abreast of current events. I read to stay informed. To get a clear picture of all sides of an issue. Can you say the same? I don’t claim to have the right opinion, but at least I have an opinion. There have been plenty of articles covering the protests. My point, as it has been from the beginning, is that someone is finally bringing to light the financial impact Tent City is having. Now hurry up, my shoes need a good shinning.
Joseph
4:37 pm on Wednesday, October 12, 2011
Dan – I’m not clouding the issues, nor am I saying that other rallies are being covered by the private sector. I’m not saying this is a political party issue either. Tea Party, Democrats, Republicans, Independents, Green, Rainbow, 50’s, 60’s 70’s, etc – I don’t care who they are. In this time of financial strain, I have a problem that the City of Boston is using our resources in the manner they are. We have protesters that took over Dewey Square, without the proper permits. They are illegally blocking traffic, bridges and causing havoc for us law abiding citizens. Mayor Mumbles has been patient and forgiving so far and I have no idea why?! Who’s to say these contributors to society (joke) can’t stay in their dorm rooms, or back at their houses and protest daily? Yeah, I get the squatting aspect has a more “in your face” sort of vibe, but isn’t a waste of taxpayer money one of the underlying issues at hand?
Joseph
4:38 pm on Wednesday, October 12, 2011
Dan (con't) -
Problem is, they’re not smart enough to realize what they’re even protesting or where to direct their anger. They should be protesting how the government is governing, and how business is conducted in DC, not how investment banks, banks, and Wall Street make profits. How about the bailout of the auto industry - How many times has that occurred? I could be wrong, but I’m pretty sure the loans to save the ENTIRE banking system was repaid by all the banks, no? Can the auto industry say the same thing? I will concede that I don’t necessarily agree with how the US Government could bail out corporations and not work with homeowners to refinance their ridiculous loans. That seems to have done more damage than good, but that is for another discussion that I will gladly participate in while James is busy shining this troll’s shoes. Working hard to be successful is what this country is all about. Not handouts. Call me callus, or a troll, but I hate how people feel they are entitled to a good living, or have what others have worked hard to achieve, verses working hard for it. Life sucks, get over it.
Dan
5:33 pm on Wednesday, October 12, 2011
Joseph -
I don't think of you as a troll, but you do have a inclination on focusing on the periphery of the subject. You seam to have a thing on what people wear or have, as such you try to classify them as being two faced.
What someone wears or presents outwardly does not imply they are being two faced. Having a smartphone maybe their only tool to post their resume online in their effort to get a job as they don't have a computer or access to one.
Just because you see an expensive pair of shoes within a picture does not mean the shoes belong on one of the protesters (i.e. Mary).
Many of us have succumbed to the image police or have become programed by the din of endless ads on radio, TV and the Internet on what one needs to own. A common issue for the young.
Some of us are not so easily swayed or have chosen to spend ones mad money on something to offset pain of dally life on something totally frivolous.
Others while living without the basics need some release as well. As an example the poor spend their hard earned money lottery tickets hopping for a way out. To the point of being an addiction.
I've been lucky, I've been around the world a few times and have seen first hand how many people live (luckily, on some else's dime). We have it much better here than many, but with that said, we have lost our way. Our personal values have shifted to the negative.
Dan
5:34 pm on Wednesday, October 12, 2011
pt2:
Instead of kicking someone try to understand them. Just don't take the words of talking heads or the trimmed viewpoint they offer. Go out meet the people discuss with them what is troubling them. I bet you will be surprised they are not much different than you.
When I was in mainland China I had a chance to spend a lot of time with a bunch families. There view point was so misshapen on who I was as an American and I was as much of them being Chinese. Over the months I was there I explained what my world was like and they did likewise with me. At the end we learned we were more alike than different! I learned an important lesson which over and over has served me well. Don't always assume the worse of people. Sure, I've had my close calls as well, but only the hatred of oppression being present.
Joseph
8:19 am on Thursday, October 13, 2011
Sounds good Dan. I understand your point. I can’t say I agree with it 100%, but that’s ok too. Believe it or not, I'm not swayed by "first impressions says it all." I usually like to give a person, or even a place to eat, a few attempts before passing judgment. I guess my daily walks around Dewey Square paints a much different picture in my mind vs others.